
The price of the jersey
A global brand's arrival is not a revolution, but the latest chapter in a long story. We have traded the permanence of place for the polish of the global brand, and we may yet come to regret the bargain.
There was a time, not so long ago in the grand scheme of things, when a cycling jersey told you where a man was from. It spoke of a region, a city, a cycling club born of local pride and funded by the town butcher or a nearby bicycle-maker. The colours were an allegiance to geography, not to a marketing department.
The news, then, that a global sportswear giant will now supply the off-bike apparel for a prominent professional cycling team is not an earthquake. It is, rather, the latest and most logical turn of a wheel that has been spinning for the better part of a century, carrying the sport ever further from its parochial roots.
The sight of the team's star riders wearing the three stripes of the German sportswear giant is merely the modern incarnation of a process that began when the sport first realised its own commercial power.
It started with names that have since acquired a patina of romance, but were, in their day, simply business. Faema coffee machines, St-Raphaël aperitifs, Mercier bicycles. These were the first trade teams, the first time the peloton became a rolling billboard. Yet there was a difference. Those brands were woven into the fabric of daily European life; their sponsorship felt like a natural extension of their identity, a part of the culture that also produced the races themselves.
That era gave way to another, one of bigger money and more abstract connections. The French national lottery, a Belgian flooring company, Italian tile manufacturers. The link to cycling became more tenuous, based not on shared culture but on a cold calculation of market exposure.
The teams became more professional, the salaries grew, but the soul of the endeavour began to change. A team’s identity was no longer rooted in a place or even a product intrinsically tied to the sport, but in a corporate entity whose commitment lasted only as long as the sponsorship contract.
The Modern Condition
Which brings us to today. The journey from the local cycling club to the globally-branded superteam is the story of modern professional sport in miniature. We have progressed from a team being from somewhere to a team being owned by someone, and now, to a team simply being branded by anyone with a deep enough marketing budget.
The team's title sponsors already represent this new globalism. Adding a corporation whose reach transcends any single sport or nation completes the picture. The team is no longer a team in the old sense of the word. It is a portfolio.
The conventional wisdom, of course, will push back on this. It will say that this is progress, and that to argue otherwise is to indulge in a sentimental nostalgia. This money, after all, is what pays for the sport we watch.
It funds the high-altitude training camps, the biomechanists, the nutritionists, and the seven-figure salaries commanded by the sport's biggest stars. Without the influx of corporate cash from outside the traditional cycling world, the sport would be a smaller, poorer, more amateurish affair. In a purely financial sense, this argument is unimpeachable. The sport has never been more professional, the athletes never more finely tuned.
But a sport is more than its balance sheet. What is lost in this relentless march of commercialisation is the very thing that once bound fans to teams: loyalty. It is difficult to feel a deep, abiding connection to a jersey whose name and colours might change entirely next season.
The fan’s allegiance shifts to the rider, a transient figure who will himself move on when a better offer appears. The result is a landscape of shifting allegiances, where teams are holding companies for talent and the jersey is a temporary skin to be shed for the next campaign. We have traded permanence for polish, a sense of belonging for a higher broadcast value.
There is a quiet irony in a major sportswear brand, built on its own deep heritage, partnering with a sport that seems increasingly willing to sell its own. The company's most famous designs are classics, revered for their history. Cycling, meanwhile, seems to be in a constant state of rebranding, its history contained in record books rather than in the continuing stories of its great teams.
So when the riders of the team appear in their new apparel, it will look sharp, professional, and entirely of the moment. It is a sign of the team's success and the sport's commercial health.
But it is also another quiet step away from the foundations on which this whole enterprise was built. The names on the jerseys change, the sponsors come and go, but the road remains. It is, in the end, the only allegiance that truly endures.
We have traded permanence for polish, a sense of belonging for a higher broadcast value.
A team’s identity was no longer rooted in a place, but in a corporate entity whose commitment lasted only as long as the sponsorship contract.
The names on the jerseys change, the sponsors come and go, but the road remains. It is, in the end, the only allegiance that truly endures.